The method behind the table
How we rank twelve crypto casinos, and what counts as evidence
Five yes-or-no questions, each answered from an operator's own terms or a licence register, set the order of the twelve casinos. Here is what they ask, what counts as proof and what the score leaves out.
This page explains how we rank the twelve crypto casinos on the home page, and why the method reads documents instead of timing anything. Every point traces back to a clause in an operator's terms or an entry in a licence register, and each one keeps a note of where it was found and on which day.
The ranking answers one practical question for anyone who wants money out of a casino: how much of the road between request and payout is written down before you deposit? A casino that prints when it checks identity, from what amount and by what deadline hands you a plan. A casino that keeps all three to itself hands you a guess. Seen from your side, how we rank comes down to one test: could you check the same fact yourself before depositing?
How we rank: five criteria and an example for each
Each criterion is a question with a yes or a no. A yes is worth one point, so the most any casino can reach is five, and equal scores are ordered alphabetically.
- An identity-check clause exists. Nine of the twelve have one. Thunderpick qualifies through clause 21.1, which lets it request documents without adding anything else; Jack.com, Wild.io and TrustDice show a dash.
- The clause names its starting point. Rainbet links the check to the moment you ask for your money (clause 20.1) and takes the point. Bitsler's clauses 8.22 and 4.3 never say when, so it does not.
- The clause states a sum. Two casinos manage this. Clause 6.6 of Bitcasino.io carries €2,500, with a crypto equivalent allowed; Rocketpot has $2,500 in clause 11.4 and a second line at $2,000 in clause 12.4.
- A deadline for documents is printed. Metaspins allows 30 days under clause 9.10 and scores. Bitcasino.io names a threshold but sets no deadline, which is exactly why it stops at four.
- The authority's register shows the licence on the operator's own domain. Wild Fortune's Anjouan entry named wildfortune.io on 12 September 2026, so it scores. Rocketpot does not, because the cert.cga.cw portal gave its certificate 1668/JAZ the status «not valid» on 12 and 13 September 2026. Neither does Metaspins, whose terms cite Anjouan while the Curaçao register carries a separate licence in the name of Metaspins N.V.
Across the twelve, the criteria are met unevenly. Nine casinos have a check clause, six name its starting point, seven pass the register test, four print a deadline, and only two print a sum. The bar chart on this page draws the same spread.
Why do four of the five points concern the identity check? Because that check is where most withdrawals stop. A request that meets every cap and minimum still waits once documents are asked for, and a clause with a sum and a deadline turns that wait into a task with an end. The guide to manual review goes through every check clause on file. The fifth point asks something else: does the number in the footer match an entry that the issuing authority keeps for that very domain? The place of the check among the other steps of a payout is shown in the five-stage outline of a request.
| Casino | Score | Licence | Identity check | Documents from | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ad | 3/5 | Curaçao · certificate names vavegame.com | At withdrawalcl. 8.7 | no amount | Visit Vave |
| 1 | 4/5 | Curaçao · register: active | After a trigger eventcl. 3.13, 6.6 | €2,500 or the crypto equivalentcl. 6.6 | Fact box |
| 2 | 4/5 | Curaçao · portal: not valid | At withdrawalcl. 11.4, 12.4 | $2,000–$2,500 (two clauses)cl. 11.4, 12.4 | Fact box |
| 3 | 4/5 | Anjouan · valid until 29 September 2026 | After a trigger eventcl. 2.7, 11.2 | no amount | Fact box |
| 6 | 3/5 | Curaçao · register: active | After a trigger eventcl. 5.2 | no amount | Fact box |
| 7 | 2/5 | Curaçao · register: active | After a trigger eventcl. 8.22, 4.3 | no amount | Fact box |
| 8 | 2/5 | Curaçao · register: active | No moment namedcl. 21.1 | no amount | Fact box |
How we rank evidence: clause, date, address
A fact enters the table only with three things attached: the clause or field it comes from, the date it was read, and the address where it was read. In practice that means four kinds of source:
- The operator's own documents on its own domain: terms, help centre, FAQ and homepage. A figure from a help centre or FAQ is labelled as such, because it is not part of the terms.
- Licence registers. The Curaçao portal cert.cga.cw is searched by domain, and ALSI numbers are looked up in the Anjouan register at anjouangaming.com.
- Protocol documentation from the projects behind Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRON and Solana, used only for properties of those chains, such as block intervals and finality. The figures themselves are gathered on the chain comparison.
- The editors' two accounts at Vave and TrustDice, reported as observations and kept out of the score.
Review portals, forums, social posts, affiliate banners and copies of pages kept on third-party servers are not used. A page that cannot be opened live is not a source at all, and a field without a source stays empty. Every address and read date is listed on the page of sources and market rules.
When two documents from the same operator disagree, both are shown. Wolfbet's clause 14 §5 sets a floor of 0.01 USD equivalent while its FAQ quotes higher amounts coin by coin, and Metaspins allows charges by method in clause 12.2 while its homepage speaks of 0% fees. A register that disagrees with the terms is handled the same way. Wild.io's certificate names Nonce Gaming B.V. and its terms name Stack Gaming Ltd, and both names appear without either one being preferred.
Read windows for this edition
Documents change, so every figure belongs to a date. The windows for the current ranking are these:
- Operators' terms: 24 August to 12 September 2026.
- Payout rules, meaning minimums, play-through, instalments, same-method rules, fees and deposit confirmations: 25 August to 8 September 2026, most of them on 2 September.
- Licence registers: 8 to 13 September 2026.
- Protocol documentation for the four chains: 15 September 2026.
If you open a casino's terms after these dates and find a different figure, the newer document is the one that binds you. Save a dated copy of the version you accept when you sign up, since that is the text any dispute will turn on.
What the score leaves out, and why no processing time appears
The score ignores bonus size, game counts and whatever speed a casino advertises. None of them can be checked against a clause before you deposit, and none of them decides what happens after you ask for your money. They may still matter to you; they simply do not move a casino up or down here.
No processing window appears anywhere on this site, not even one printed as an upper limit in an operator's own terms. A stated window is a promise about the operator's own behaviour. You cannot verify it in advance, and a single observed result says nothing reliable about the next request. A threshold, a deadline or a cap works differently, since it is either in the document or it is not. All such rules for the twelve are lined up on the matrix of payout terms.
Where a field has nothing on file, the table shows a dash «—». A dash earns no point and makes no claim in either direction; it marks a cell without a clause behind it. How approval, broadcast and confirmation divide the wait between operator and chain is set out on the page about the three clocks of a payout.
Vave, the only paid placement
Vave is the one casino that paid for its position. It stands above the table, carries the label «ad» and has no rank. Its five squares are filled in on the same criteria, so you can compare it with the twelve. Clause 8.7 places the check before payouts, which names the moment. The same clause gives 14 days for documents but prints no sum.
On 12 September 2026 the Curaçao certificate of Latcas B.V., number OGL/2024/1676/0905, listed vavegame.com and not vave.com, so the register square stays empty and the total is three of five. Paying for the slot buys the position above the table and nothing else. It does not change how the twelve are ordered, and Vave's facts meet the same evidence rules as everyone else's.
Re-checks after the read windows
Some facts come with an end date. The Anjouan register gives Wild Fortune's licence ALSI-202509073-FI2 an expiry of 29 September 2026; after that day the entry will be looked up again, and the table will show whatever the register then shows. Rocketpot's certificate is looked up again in the same round, because a status in the Curaçao portal can change in either direction. Any movement is entered with its date in the change log, and the ranking itself is recalculated from the five squares rather than adjusted by hand.
Two accounts run with the editors' own money
Only two things on the site involved deposits rather than reading. Both are described here in full.
Vave, 28 August 2026. The editors deposited their own money at Vave and withdrew it again. No withdrawal met an ID check until the combined amount taken out came to about 5,000 USDT. A single account in a single period proves no rule, and clause 8.7 still permits Vave to check identity before any payout.
TrustDice, May 2026. Over several weeks the editors paid USDT into TrustDice. Nothing was verified while withdrawals stayed below a running total of about US$5,000; the request after that line went to «payment under review». A compliance email arrived with a Veriff link. The Veriff step turned down a driving licence and took a passport at the fifth try. Later on, TrustDice asked by email for documents once more.
Neither account adds or removes a point. Together they show what a check can look like from the inside, which no clause describes, and they are the only places on this site where money was used rather than documents read. For the ranking that follows from all of this, see the twelve profiles with fact boxes.